API review

Proposer: Brian Gerkey

Present at review:

  • Josh Faust
  • Tully Foote
  • Ken Conley

Question / concerns / comments

Enter your thoughts on the API and any questions / concerns you have here. Please sign your name. Anything you want to address in the API review should be marked down here before the start of the meeting.

  • Ken: rospack_ prefix nomenclature is a misnomer and klunky, but probably not worth changing at this point.
  • Josh: rospack_is_test_harness is poorly named.
  • Ken should write a script to validate usage of rospack(package_name)

Meeting agenda

To be filled out by proposer based on comments gathered during API review period


Package status change mark change manifest)

  • /!\ Action items that need to be taken.

  • {X} Major issues that need to be resolved

  • /!\ rospack_is_test_harness -> rospack_declare_test

  • /!\ write a Hudson script to audit rospack(package_name) (not required for release)

API Conditional Pass

Wiki: rosbuild/Reviews/2009-02-05_API_Review (last edited 2009-08-14 20:53:40 by localhost)