vision_opencv/Reviews/2011-1 Diamondback Doc_Doc_Review

Reviewer: Ken Conley

Instructions for doing a doc review

See DocReviewProcess for more instructions

  1. Does the documentation define the Users of the Stack, i.e. for the expected usages of the Stack, which APIs will users engage with?
  2. Are all of these APIs documented?
  3. Do relevant usages have associated tutorials?
  4. Have all Packages in the Stack been API reviewed?

  5. Does the Stack conform to the StackDocumentation guidelines?

  6. Are there Packages in the Stack that don't belong

Concerns / issues

Roadmap was out-of-date, needs to be updated

Multiple tickets still assigned to 1.1, 2 critical tickets still open as well

  • [FIXED] 1.3 tickets pushed, and critical ticket downgraded

[FIXED]: doc review template was pointing at vision_opencv

[SHOULD BE FIXED]: stage page was pulling in from flyatar instead. Blacklisted that repo for now, need to investigate on backend.

Manifest for stage is wrong re: version.

  • [FIXED]: updated version info and released 1.2.3.


Wiki: simulator_stage/Reviews/2011-1 Diamondback Doc_Doc_Review (last edited 2011-01-25 06:32:15 by BrianGerkey)