dynamic_reconfigure/Reviews/Jan 11 2010_Doc_Review

Reviewer:

Instructions for doing a doc review

See DocReviewProcess for more instructions

1. Does the documentation define the Users of your Package, i.e. for the expected usages of your Stack, which APIs will users engage with?
2. Are all of these APIs documented?
3. Do relevant usages have associated tutorials? (you can ignore this if a Stack-level tutorial covers the relevant usage), and are the indexed in the right places?
4. If there are hardware dependencies of the Package, are these documented?
5. Is it clear to an outside user what the roadmap is for the Package?
6. Is it clear to an outside user what the stability is for the Package?
7. Are concepts introduced by the Package well illustrated?
8. Is the research related to the Package referenced properly? i.e. can users easily get to relevant papers?
9. Are any mathematical formulas in the Package not covered by papers properly documented?

For each launch file in a Package

1. Is it clear how to run that launch file?
2. Does the launch file start up with no errors when run correctly?
3. Do the Nodes in that launch file correctly use ROS_ERROR/ROS_WARN/ROS_INFO logging levels?

Concerns / issues

Vijay

• You should provide a more of an explanation in the intro as to what this package does. I know it "facilitates dynamic node reconfiguration", but I don't know what "dynamic node reconfiguration" actually is.

  • Fixed.

• Not completely sure why the "currently supported commands" are in a verbatim block.

  • Fixed.

• The order of the "currently supported commands" probably should match the order of the more detailed descriptions.

  • Fixed.

Tim

• I added a couple of screenshots to illustrate reconfigure_gui.

• dynparam set also accepts yaml on the command-line (e.g. the result of dynparam get) - should document that usage

  • Fixed.

• I added a missing /node in the dynparam set usage

Conclusion