API review

Proposer: Brian Gerkey

Present at review:

• Josh Faust
• Tully Foote
• Ken Conley

Question / concerns / comments

Enter your thoughts on the API and any questions / concerns you have here. Please sign your name. Anything you want to address in the API review should be marked down here before the start of the meeting.

• Ken: rospack_ prefix nomenclature is a misnomer and klunky, but probably not worth changing at this point.
• Josh: rospack_is_test_harness is poorly named.
• Ken should write a script to validate usage of rospack(package_name)

Meeting agenda

To be filled out by proposer based on comments gathered during API review period

Conclusion

Package status change mark change manifest)

• Action items that need to be taken.

• Major issues that need to be resolved

• rospack_is_test_harness -> rospack_declare_test

• write a Hudson script to audit rospack(package_name) (not required for release)

API Conditional Pass